Why Discipleship is Our Only Hope

I came across this post from Bill Hull today.  Bill is also the author of the excellent book The Disciplemaking Pastor.  I highly recommend it if you have not read it.  It provides a much more biblically sound ecclesiology than is practice in most evangelical churches.

The post deals with the problem present in most evangelical churches – no planned discipleship.  Our history has led to this crisis.  Evangelical churches still hold to a one-time crisis conversion event.  When this event occurs the only prescribed steps of discipleship which follow are a membership class and baptism.  This has led to a spiritually anemic church.  Hull urges us to consider the biblical mandate.  Here is a brief taste of the post:

The reason the Christian faith has not transformed American culture is that it has not significantly transformed the majority of Christians. The American church has taught a gospel that most often has been unaccompanied by discipleship.When the gospel loses discipleship, it loses the permission and the ability to teach people deeply. This eliminates the process Jesus commanded, “ teach them to obey everything I have commanded you.”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Planting Churches that Reproduce

Joel Comiskey divides the book into three sections in which he outlines: first, the foundations of a simple church; second, the principles of a simple church; third, the strategies for starting simple churches. He supplies many personal examples from his own church planting ministry experience, which is helpful. He also provides many examples of others who are in the trenches of planting simple church movements around the world. The examples of widespread simple church movements open one’s eyes to the possibility of rectifying many of the frustrations found in present ministry models. This is a breath of fresh air.

Comiskey begins the first section of the book by repeatedly emphasizing the difficulty of planting a new church. This is especially helpful for any who read this book. He does not leave out the harsh realities of beginning from scratch. The author likens church plants to cacti in the desert. He clearly states the truth when he proclaims that a church planter must win people to Christ or the church plant will not survive. This goes along with the principle that without people there is no church. One must grow to survive is the clear message of the author. Comiskey also clearly points out the need for developing leadership within the pilot small group. There must be training that takes place at a separate time to ensure that the believers within the pilot group are growing spiritually and being equipped to minister within the small group. Once a believer completes the training he is equipped to lead his own small group. Comiskey emphasizes the importance of every member being a minister within the group. This helps people to grow spiritually and to be carrying out the biblical principles of Christianity. Yet, the author never hides the reality of hardship in church planting. The honesty is refreshing.

Next, the author defines for his readers what it actually means to be a simple church. He repeatedly emphasizes the importance of the church model being simple enough so that it may be reproduced elsewhere. If the model is too complicated it will not be reproduced. Comiskey sets forth four principles which he believes help to define simply what a church is: first, it should have more than three people (Mt. 18:15-35); second, there should be God-appointed leadership; third, it operates under Christ’s lordship; fourth, it practices baptism and the Lord’s Supper.1 The author completes the first section by providing ample N.T. examples of a simple church model. In the two works which I have been exposed to so far, Comiskey attempts to recover a biblical model of doing ministry. This is admirable and inspiring.

In the second section, the author dives into the issues which must be settled before anyone attempts to plant a church (simple model or not). He spends a chapter questioning whether the potential church planter is actually supposed to be a church planter. He provides an example of a man who was passionate about planting a church but did not have the make-up to do so. Comiskey comments on a couple of different tools which help to evaluate the gifting and make-up of individuals to determine whether they should be church planters. He comments that everyone contemplating church planting should submit to some process of evaluation before planting.

The author suggests that future planters determine to prioritize prayer in everything they are doing in ministry. They will need prayer support from other believers to be successful. They also need to determine the core values of the future plant. Comiskey mentions that there are universal principles which will be included in the values but there will also be contextual variations in the values as the church attempts to reach its target population. The author speaks often of the importance of planting a church with a team rather than alone. He trumpets the benefits of shared leadership with a shared ministry load.

Beyond shared leadership, Comiskey urges the leaders to have a coach who will provide encouragement, prayer, ministry, and training. Part of the motivation for this is the discouragement that is often a part of the planting process. The author believes that the presence of a ministry coach will help the planter to endure the slow growth process. He also encourages potential planters to learn as much as possible about the area where they plan to plant. Missionaries on foreign fields must learn culture before and during their ministry overseas. Church planters must also become familiar with their ministry context. This also helps to establish contacts with potential members of the pilot group. There are many principles which must be seriously considered before attempting to plant a church.

In the third section, the author describes cell driven ministry and how to plant a cell church. There is overlap with the previous book, The Church that Multiplies, but the review is helpful. The principles of cell-driven ministry are inspiring. The process of: beginning a pilot cell and living the Christian life deeply together; training leaders; evangelizing as a group and discipling converts, multiplying groups with new leaders and coaching the leaders; the thought of the whole cell-driven model is exciting.

Following the chapters on cell churches, the author outlines how to plant house churches. As is mentioned in the material, house church networks and cell churches are similar in many ways. The words which are used repeatedly are: simple and reproducible. These words are music to my ears. One thing which I did not agree with was the lack of formal leadership in many examples of the house church. Comiskey also touches on this as a potential weakness, along with the lack of coaching for house church leaders. Some within the house church movement are working to resolve these issues. I also noticed a related issue to the lack of formally trained leadership, the lack of biblical training among house church leaders. This could truly harm the quality of the house churches. The potential for heresy would be present. The author mentions house church networks as a solution for some of the potential pitfalls of the movement.

Comiskey ends the book with a call to plant simple reproducible churches. I am in complete agreement with him. I would love to see, experience, and be involved in this model of ministry. I love reading about it but need to see it to be able to really understand everything he is describing. We do need to have more simple churches which are reproducible. I have thought over and over about the principles which the author shares. I long to be involved in a ministry model like the one the author outlines. It seems that this is as close to the biblical model as I have seen. As I seek God’s will in my life, I would absolutely love to learn firsthand how to function in, lead in, train in, and reproduce in a cell-driven ministry. I do not know exactly how this will happen but it is my prayer to do so.

Overall, I think this was an excellent book and very beneficial in formulating my thinking.

1pp. 45-46.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Importance of Biblical Teaching and Discipleship

This is an extremely important issue.  The saints must be discipled in the deep truths of God’s Word.  This is God’s desire that believers grow to full maturity in Christ.  It is what He has predestined to occur in their lives.  God wills that believers be conformed to the image of Christ.  James MacDonald states this very well in his latest blog post Starving Saints.  Check it out.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Who will recommend the HCSB?

This has bothered me for some time now.  I believe that the HCSB is an excellent translation of the Scriptures.  The only problem is that there is not a comprehensive list of scholars and pastors (graduate students and bloggers) who recommend the HCSB.  I think that those who are supporters of the HCSB should work to remedy this problem.  Any person can do a simple web search and find that the ESV has a long list of scholars and pastors (graduate students and bloggers) who heartily recommend this respective translation.

The HCSB is a very well done translation and I am certain that there are plenty of scholars and pastors who would heartily recommend the HCSB.  My challenge for you who support the HCSB (including Graduate students and bloggers), write a paragraph (I emphasize paragraph) about why you recommend the HCSB.  Let’s see if a comprehensive list of HCSB supporters could be compiled.  Who is willing to help?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]Update:
It was suggested to me by Jedidiah Coppenger (who works for Lifeway and is working to promote the HCSB) that this discussion be expanded to include PhD students (or students in graduate studies) and bloggers.  I think that is a fine idea.  So for anyone who has used the HCSB and would like to express their thoughts about the translation, feel free to do so.  Here is a link to some of my thoughts that I previously posted.

HCSB Minister’s Bible Giveaway

Will at Anwoth blog is giving away a limited edition HCSB Minister’s Bible to someone who gives him ten reasons why you like the HCSB.  Check it out!

Here are my own recently updated reasons:

1) Conservative scholars translated it and reviewed it.
2) It is translated from the most reliable manuscripts.
3) It has attempted to avoid being bound by traditional renderings
4) It is a formal translation that is very, very readable. [Marketers of the ESV should take note. The HCSB is literal, but also very readable. The ESV is literal, but not as readable.]
5) It is published by a conservative Christian company
6) It retains traditional theological terms
7) The bullet notes are excellent. I wish that there were some way to place the bullet note information closer to the appropriate text. I have come to despise end-notes and love footnotes. Honestly, I do not know where this information could be placed in the footer because the textual notes (which are even more valuable than the bullet notes) are already located in the footer. I do not know what the answer is, other than for me to get over my aversion to the end-notes.
8) It will be distributed worldwide for evangelism purposes through Holman Bible Outreach International
9) There are many editions produced which are evangelism Bible handbooks; ex: Share Jesus Without Fear N.T.; The Way of the Master N.T.; Darwin’s Bible; Atheist’s Bible.
10) Those who are involved in the process of revision are truly listening to those who will be using the HCSB in local churches, colleges, and seminaries. I appreciate that they are trying their best by God’s grace to “get it right.” Praise the Lord for this desire.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Celebrating Christ at Christmas

My wife and I have been doing a lot of thinking about how we as born again Christians celebrate Christmas.  Our son is turning five this May and our daughter is turning three this May, so we have been teaching them why we celebrate Christmas.  We celebrate Christmas because we are so happy that Jesus was born.  This is the true meaning for Christians, that God the Son took on flesh for the purpose of providing substitutionary atonement for mankind’s sins.  But, we still give presents to each other.  We buy things for people who don’t really need anything.

What does this have to do with celebrating the birth of Christ?  Initially we said that we give presents to each other because we are so happy that Jesus was born.  It has gotten harder and harder to say that this is the genuine reason for why we do what we do.  If we celebrate Christmas because we are so happy that Jesus was born to save us from our sins, Christmas should be about worshiping God through Jesus Christ.  My wife and I discussed how we as a family can best do this in the coming years.

We are going to show the love of Christ to others:

  1. We want to invite others over to our house for a special Christmas dinner, people who don’t have anywhere else to go.
  2. We want to serve at a soup kitchen or shelter
  3. We want to do things “unto the least of these” as though we were doing them for Jesus Himself
  4. We want to take time to worship Jesus through – praises, testimonies, singing
  5. We don’t want to buy presents for our family, friends, etc… at Christmas anymore.  We want to give “gifts” to Jesus since we are celebrating Him, like the aforementioned items.
  6. We will buy presents for people on their birthdays because that is when we celebrate them as people.
  7. We want to keep Christmas all about Jesus.

This is a rough sketch of what we are thinking about doing.  Anyone else ever think about this?  Even in the Christian world, Christmas seems to be more about us than it does about Jesus.  I know we say differently but our actions to the contrary show otherwise.  Any thoughts?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Life movitated by the glory of God

I have been thinking about John Piper’s suggestion that he has set forth repeatedly in his different books, that is, being motivated by the glory of God to evangelize.  I had not previously formulated this as a proper motivation for evangelism before I heard it from Piper.  This is actually a very biblical idea.  When one reads of Moses speaking to the Israelites prior to entering the Promised Land he mentions,

“For what great nation is there that has a god near to it as the Lord our God is ⌊to us⌋ whenever we call to Him?
8 And what great nation has righteous statutes and ordinances like this entire law I set before you today?
9 “Only be on your guard and diligently watch yourselves, so that you don’t forget the things your eyes have seen and so that they don’t slip from your mind as long as you live. Teach them to your children and your grandchildren.
10 The day you stood before the Lord your God at Horeb, the Lord said to me, ‘Assemble the people before Me, and I will let them hear My words, so that they may learn to fear Me all the days they live on the earth and may instruct their children.’
11 You came near and stood at the base of the mountain, a mountain blazing with fire into the heavens and enveloped in a dense, black cloud.
12 Then the Lord spoke to you from the fire. You kept hearing the sound of the words, but didn’t see a form; there was only a voice.
13 He declared His covenant to you. He commanded you to follow the Ten Commandments, which He wrote on two stone tablets.
14 At that time the Lord commanded me to teach you statutes and ordinances for you to follow in the land you are about to cross into and possess.

“Indeed, ask about the earlier days that preceded you, from the day God created man on the earth and from one end of the heavens to the other: Has anything like this great event ⌊ever⌋ happened, or has anything like it been heard of?
33 Has a people heard God’s voice speaking from the fire as you have, and lived?
34 Or has a god attempted to go and take a nation as his own out of ⌊another⌋ nation, by trials, signs, wonders, and war, by a strong hand and an outstretched arm, by great terrors, as the Lord your God did for you in Egypt before your eyes?
35 You were shown ⌊these things⌋ so that you would know that the Lord is God; there is no other besides Him.
36 He let you hear His voice from heaven to instruct you. He showed you His great fire on earth, and you heard His words from the fire.
37 Because He loved your fathers, He chose their descendants after them and brought you out of Egypt by His presence and great power,
38 to drive out before you nations greater and stronger than you and to bring you in and give you their land as an inheritance, as is now taking place.
39 Today, recognize and keep in mind that the Lord is God in heaven above and on earth below; there is no other.
40 Keep His statutes and commands, which I am giving you today, so that you and your children after you may prosper and so that you may live long in the land the Lord your God is giving you for all time.”  Deuteronomy 4:1-14, 32-40 HCSB

This is something that born again Christians should genuinely consider.  Guilt does not work well as motivation.  Yet, every one of us is very inclined to share with others about magnificent moments in life:  good deals on cars, insurance, groceries, clothes, etc…  Yet, born again Christians have a relationship with the one true God through faith in Christ’s substitutionary atonement.  This is truly powerful motivation to speak to the nations about the great God who has ransomed us through His Son.  Consider living your life motivated by the greatness which belongs to the God of the Bible.

Philosophy of Translation

I have been considering the varying philosophies of translation that biblical scholars are employing to produce the most recent versions of the Bible and have begun to wonder about the shift in focus.  The translations that come from the Tyndale line followed a formal-equivalence philosophy of translation.  The reason for this seems to be a respect for the nature of the task.  The Scriptures are not just some ordinary letter being translated for just any people.  The Scriptures are God-breathed.  This led the translators to be very cautious in their renderings of the original languages into English.  They were reluctant to over-translate or paraphrase the text because it is God’s Word.

Today, it seems that translators have learned so much that they are more inclined to put more of their interpretive ideas into the translation of the original languages of Scripture.  The thought that keeps coming to my mind is that the modern translators are not nearly as cautious about using a dynamic-equivalence translation philosophy because they do not seem to be as awestruck about the task they are undertaking.  The thought of translating the inspired Word of God for a contemporary audience is a huge and scary responsibility.  In my opinion, I think there needs to be more awe in the hearts and minds of some translators.  I believe that this would cause the translators to not be so free in their renderings but reverently translating the text as clearly as possible without sacrificing the accuracy of the original languages.

These are just some thoughts.  Does this seem to make any sense to anyone else?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]