Why Discipleship is Our Only Hope

I came across this post from Bill Hull today.  Bill is also the author of the excellent book The Disciplemaking Pastor.  I highly recommend it if you have not read it.  It provides a much more biblically sound ecclesiology than is practice in most evangelical churches.

The post deals with the problem present in most evangelical churches – no planned discipleship.  Our history has led to this crisis.  Evangelical churches still hold to a one-time crisis conversion event.  When this event occurs the only prescribed steps of discipleship which follow are a membership class and baptism.  This has led to a spiritually anemic church.  Hull urges us to consider the biblical mandate.  Here is a brief taste of the post:

The reason the Christian faith has not transformed American culture is that it has not significantly transformed the majority of Christians. The American church has taught a gospel that most often has been unaccompanied by discipleship.When the gospel loses discipleship, it loses the permission and the ability to teach people deeply. This eliminates the process Jesus commanded, “ teach them to obey everything I have commanded you.”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Planting Churches that Reproduce

Joel Comiskey divides the book into three sections in which he outlines: first, the foundations of a simple church; second, the principles of a simple church; third, the strategies for starting simple churches. He supplies many personal examples from his own church planting ministry experience, which is helpful. He also provides many examples of others who are in the trenches of planting simple church movements around the world. The examples of widespread simple church movements open one’s eyes to the possibility of rectifying many of the frustrations found in present ministry models. This is a breath of fresh air.

Comiskey begins the first section of the book by repeatedly emphasizing the difficulty of planting a new church. This is especially helpful for any who read this book. He does not leave out the harsh realities of beginning from scratch. The author likens church plants to cacti in the desert. He clearly states the truth when he proclaims that a church planter must win people to Christ or the church plant will not survive. This goes along with the principle that without people there is no church. One must grow to survive is the clear message of the author. Comiskey also clearly points out the need for developing leadership within the pilot small group. There must be training that takes place at a separate time to ensure that the believers within the pilot group are growing spiritually and being equipped to minister within the small group. Once a believer completes the training he is equipped to lead his own small group. Comiskey emphasizes the importance of every member being a minister within the group. This helps people to grow spiritually and to be carrying out the biblical principles of Christianity. Yet, the author never hides the reality of hardship in church planting. The honesty is refreshing.

Next, the author defines for his readers what it actually means to be a simple church. He repeatedly emphasizes the importance of the church model being simple enough so that it may be reproduced elsewhere. If the model is too complicated it will not be reproduced. Comiskey sets forth four principles which he believes help to define simply what a church is: first, it should have more than three people (Mt. 18:15-35); second, there should be God-appointed leadership; third, it operates under Christ’s lordship; fourth, it practices baptism and the Lord’s Supper.1 The author completes the first section by providing ample N.T. examples of a simple church model. In the two works which I have been exposed to so far, Comiskey attempts to recover a biblical model of doing ministry. This is admirable and inspiring.

In the second section, the author dives into the issues which must be settled before anyone attempts to plant a church (simple model or not). He spends a chapter questioning whether the potential church planter is actually supposed to be a church planter. He provides an example of a man who was passionate about planting a church but did not have the make-up to do so. Comiskey comments on a couple of different tools which help to evaluate the gifting and make-up of individuals to determine whether they should be church planters. He comments that everyone contemplating church planting should submit to some process of evaluation before planting.

The author suggests that future planters determine to prioritize prayer in everything they are doing in ministry. They will need prayer support from other believers to be successful. They also need to determine the core values of the future plant. Comiskey mentions that there are universal principles which will be included in the values but there will also be contextual variations in the values as the church attempts to reach its target population. The author speaks often of the importance of planting a church with a team rather than alone. He trumpets the benefits of shared leadership with a shared ministry load.

Beyond shared leadership, Comiskey urges the leaders to have a coach who will provide encouragement, prayer, ministry, and training. Part of the motivation for this is the discouragement that is often a part of the planting process. The author believes that the presence of a ministry coach will help the planter to endure the slow growth process. He also encourages potential planters to learn as much as possible about the area where they plan to plant. Missionaries on foreign fields must learn culture before and during their ministry overseas. Church planters must also become familiar with their ministry context. This also helps to establish contacts with potential members of the pilot group. There are many principles which must be seriously considered before attempting to plant a church.

In the third section, the author describes cell driven ministry and how to plant a cell church. There is overlap with the previous book, The Church that Multiplies, but the review is helpful. The principles of cell-driven ministry are inspiring. The process of: beginning a pilot cell and living the Christian life deeply together; training leaders; evangelizing as a group and discipling converts, multiplying groups with new leaders and coaching the leaders; the thought of the whole cell-driven model is exciting.

Following the chapters on cell churches, the author outlines how to plant house churches. As is mentioned in the material, house church networks and cell churches are similar in many ways. The words which are used repeatedly are: simple and reproducible. These words are music to my ears. One thing which I did not agree with was the lack of formal leadership in many examples of the house church. Comiskey also touches on this as a potential weakness, along with the lack of coaching for house church leaders. Some within the house church movement are working to resolve these issues. I also noticed a related issue to the lack of formally trained leadership, the lack of biblical training among house church leaders. This could truly harm the quality of the house churches. The potential for heresy would be present. The author mentions house church networks as a solution for some of the potential pitfalls of the movement.

Comiskey ends the book with a call to plant simple reproducible churches. I am in complete agreement with him. I would love to see, experience, and be involved in this model of ministry. I love reading about it but need to see it to be able to really understand everything he is describing. We do need to have more simple churches which are reproducible. I have thought over and over about the principles which the author shares. I long to be involved in a ministry model like the one the author outlines. It seems that this is as close to the biblical model as I have seen. As I seek God’s will in my life, I would absolutely love to learn firsthand how to function in, lead in, train in, and reproduce in a cell-driven ministry. I do not know exactly how this will happen but it is my prayer to do so.

Overall, I think this was an excellent book and very beneficial in formulating my thinking.

1pp. 45-46.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

John MacArthur’s Contribution to Evangelical Christianity

I was thinking about this whole subject the other day and some very important thoughts came to my mind.  MacArthur gains his share of criticism from others in the Evangelical community and outside, but what prominent figure in any arena of life doesn’t get criticism.  There are a couple of immensely important contributions that MacArthur makes through his teaching ministry and ministry model.  I mentioned the following things to my wife:

  • MacArthur has modeled and promoted expository preaching The other day I heard him described by someone as the “prince of expository preaching.”  I believe that Spurgeon was the so-called “prince of preachers.”  One thing anyone knows who has read over the sermons of Spurgeon, though a bold proclaimer of biblical truth, his sermons are far from expository.  MacArthur on the other hand has trumpeted the necessity of expository preaching and it comes a very crucial time in evangelicalism.  Much of preaching in popular evangelicalism amounts to nothing more than a Psychological self-help session with a few Bible verses thrown in for good measure.  I am thankful for MacArthur using his public presence in evangelical Christianity for the purpose of modeling and lauding the necessity of expository preaching.  It has set a worthy example for those men, who are soon to be and already are involved, in ministry.
  • MacArthur has provided a biblical model of church governance – This statement will cause some who read this some consternation, especially congregationalists.  When one takes an honest look at the N.T. teaching on how churches are to function with a plurality of elders functioning in leadership over the congregation, spending their time in the study, preaching, and teaching of Scripture, and equipping the body for ministry, MacArthur’s church appears to have done a fine job of following the biblical pattern.  This is why so many men are leaving “fellowships” like the GARBC.  The churches in many of these fundamentalist camps do not promote or function with this biblical model.  Many of these fundamentalist movements began with admirable motivations but now function with the identity of being “separate from everything.”  This has resulted in these movements having churches full of disagreeable people who want to vote on everything.  This is why I am thankful for men like John MacArthur for modeling this in his church and teaching it through his ministry.

One final thought that I would like to share is that there are some younger men who are attempting to practice the same model of ministry which MacArthur has practiced.  One man who comes to my mind is James MacDonald.  I would like to thank the Lord for men like this who have provided a worthy example of biblical preaching, church governance model, biblical church ministry, and love for the God of the Bible.

Update:

Obviously the list is not exhaustive, nor is it meant to be a blanket approval of everything John MacArthur does or says.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

ESV Wide Margin Reference Edition (Tru-Tone Portfolio Edition)

I received a review copy of the ESV Wide Margin Reference Edition from Crossway a few weeks ago. I have been a longtime NASB user. The edition that was sent to me was the Portfolio style in TruTone. The cover itself is beautiful. It is very soft to the touch and flexible. It is a delight to hold. It is obviously not as nice as a calfskin cover, but from what I have heard it may be superior to the genuine leather edition. The pages are fairly thick, thicker than most other Bible paper. The paper is not as nice as that found in Lockman NASB’s (large print ultrathin reference Bible and the wide margin reference Bible). There is a nice amount of space on the outside edge of the page for which to write notes. It is unfortunate (as many others have written) that the inside margin is too narrow for writing notes. The one request that I have for Crossway is that they switch this edition to a sewn binding. It is glued and eventually will begin to pull away. The glued binding also keeps the Bible from laying completely flat. One interesting note, the box said that the Bible is guaranteed for life! This is an impressive promise.

The translation itself is very similar to the NASB. There are some places where the scholars have updated some archaic words or renderings which are contained in the NASB such as, brethren to brothers; only begotten Son to only Son. There are some places where the ESV has eliminated some of the supplied words that are used in the NASB, which at times has led to greater clarity. Interestingly enough, the ESV does use some anglicized wording that does sound a little odd to the modern-day American reader such as, haughty, rubbish, puffed up (which I realize is a literal metaphor from the Greek language). I will not belabor the point. It is something that each individual believer would need to examine to determine if the language is comfortable for him.

I would like to say that I do believe that the ESV is a very good translation. I would highly recommend it to others. I believe that it is an accurate translation which will be useful to the church. Crossway has also provided many excellent editions of this translation which make it very likely that a believer will find an edition that fits his preferences such as, the personal reference Bible, classic reference Bible, thin-line edition, the single column reference edition, as well as many others. I really like the TruTone editions that Crossway has produced, they make it possible to have a very attractive Bible which is pleasant to hold and use.

If you are interested in this edition or other editions of the ESV, I would recommend that you check out the Westminster Seminary bookstore as a result of their exceptional prices.

It is a glued binding so the Bible does not lay completely flat when opened, but not terrible.  One thing that was surprising is that Crossway now offers a Life-time guarantee on these Bibles.

The wide margins are nice.  The paper is also surprisingly nice.  It is a black letter text in paragraph format, very nice.

The TruTone cover is soft and flexible.  As you can see the Bible does open nicely, even though it is not a sewn binding.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

ESV Wide Margin Reference Edition (Tru-Tone Portfolio Edition)

I received a review copy of the ESV Wide Margin Reference Edition from Crossway a few weeks ago. I have been a longtime NASB user. The edition that was sent to me was the Portfolio style in TruTone. The cover itself is beautiful. It is very soft to the touch and flexible. It is a delight to hold. It is obviously not as nice as a calfskin cover, but from what I have heard it may be superior to the genuine leather edition. The pages are fairly thick, thicker than most other Bible paper. The paper is not as nice as that found in Lockman NASB’s (large print ultrathin reference Bible and the wide margin reference Bible). There is a nice amount of space on the outside edge of the page for which to write notes. It is unfortunate (as many others have written) that the inside margin is too narrow for writing notes. The one request that I have for Crossway is that they switch this edition to a sewn binding. It is glued and eventually will begin to pull away. The glued binding also keeps the Bible from laying completely flat. One interesting note, the box said that the Bible is guaranteed for life! This is an impressive promise.

The translation itself is very similar to the NASB. There are some places where the scholars have updated some archaic words or renderings which are contained in the NASB such as, brethren to brothers; only begotten Son to only Son. There are some places where the ESV has eliminated some of the supplied words that are used in the NASB, which at times has led to greater clarity. Interestingly enough, the ESV does use some anglicized wording that does sound a little odd to the modern-day American reader such as, haughty, rubbish, puffed up (which I realize is a literal metaphor from the Greek language). I will not belabor the point. It is something that each individual believer would need to examine to determine if the language is comfortable for him.

I would like to say that I do believe that the ESV is a very good translation. I would highly recommend it to others. I believe that it is an accurate translation which will be useful to the church. Crossway has also provided many excellent editions of this translation which make it very likely that a believer will find an edition that fits his preferences such as, the personal reference Bible, classic reference Bible, thin-line edition, the single column reference edition, as well as many others. I really like the TruTone editions that Crossway has produced, they make it possible to have a very attractive Bible which is pleasant to hold and use.

If you are interested in this edition or other editions of the ESV, I would recommend that you check out the Westminster Seminary bookstore as a result of their exceptional prices.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Breakout Churches by Thom Rainer

I picked this book up for very obvious reasons.  The story follows churches that were in continual decline for a number of years and then under the same pastoral leadership turned around and saw significant continual growth.  Rainer and his team study 13 churches.  Admittedly the team was surprised that only 13 churches fit the criteria of being a break out church.  After spending considerable time attempting to locate churches which fit the criteria they struggled to find 13.  Rainer admits that the principles presented cannot be viewed as a “magic solution” to transform a stagnant church because God cannot be manipulated.  The team sadly discovered that for a stagnant church to become a break out church it came at a great price.  The pastoral leadership of these churches paid a high price physically and emotionally.  There was a great deal of resistance and spiritual warfare involved in the transformation process.

In the end of the book showed the fruit of a few pastors who were willing to pay a high price to lead mediocre churches to become what God saved them to become.  It is sad that the reason for the churches become mediocre in the first place was apathy and selfishness.  Praise God for the few that have changed.  I would highly recommend the book.  It is not a magic solution.  Yet, there is some valuable information here.  It debunks a lot of the proposals that church growth literature promotes as essentials.  A valuable work.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]