We live in a time when emotions run high, but not just high. It would be more accurate to say that they run roughshod over our culture, including within the evangelical church. Universities across the country are filled with students who have been coddled and conditioned to be driven by their emotions. Grade Schools are filled with students who have been trained to be held captive by their emotions. I am in my mid-forties now but I can vividly remember being taught (in the 1980’s and 1990’s) to follow my heart (one of many subtle messages designed to undermine truth as the authority). This message was present across the culture. It was found in music, cartoons, sitcoms, movies, comic books, school curricula, news broadcasts, etc… The message of emotionalism was not always explicit, but it was certainly implicit. At this point, you may wonder if this emotionally driven mindset is still a problem. The short answer is… it is worse.
We have to remember that it was not that long ago, within the broader culture of the United States, the consensus was that truth trumps feelings. Now, I understand that just because a cultural majority believes (or wants) something does not make it valid, but it is an evidence of a majority Christian consensus that once existed within the culture. That such a reality sounds foreign to us demonstrates how effective the secular agenda has been. At this point, you may think that I have a knack for the obvious. How does this issue affect us in the evangelical church? We, like our culture, have become afraid of upsetting or displeasing others. Allie Beth Stuckey writes about the manipulative pressure that is applied, “’If you really care about women, you’ll support their right to choose. If you really respect people, you’ll use preferred pronouns. If you’re really a kind person, you’ll celebrate all love. If you’re really compassionate, you’ll welcome the immigrant. If you’re really a Christian, you’ll fight for social justice.’ You’re probably familiar with this line of thinking. The goal of statements like these—examples of toxic empathy—is to get us to suppress our opposition to a particular issue or point of view by playing upon our desire to be a good person.”[1]
Many seem to function as though niceness has replaced kindness as a fruit of the Spirit (Gal. 5:22-24). It really has not, at least not legitimately. Scripture hasn’t changed. But, in practice many have already made the swap. How is this possible? It is the result of a concerted effort by the unbelieving world system to squeeze Christians into its mold (cf. Rom. 12:1-2). The world has determined that all Christians must be nice. It can’t be all that bad can it? Who doesn’t want to be nice? The problem is that the world has defined niceness as being accepting, tolerant, and non-confrontational. If you do not accept and approve of the world’s ways then you are not nice, or loving for that matter. We can’t have that, can we? It sounds kind of bad. The emotional grenade is thrown into the room, “Aren’t Christians supposed to be nice and loving? Jesus was nice and loving, why aren’t you?” This is the message that is foisted upon Christians. Believers have worried that if the world is upset with us then we must be doing something wrong. This is not automatically true. Again, Scripture is the standard concerning right and wrong, not how someone feels. As Christians, we believe that Jesus Christ is Lord (Phil. 2:11; Rom. 10:9; 14:9). The Word of God is our authority in all matters (2 Tim. 3:16-17; 2 Peter 1:20-21; 1 John 5:3). Regardless of how I feel, or you feel, or anyone else feels, truth trumps emotion.
Let’s consider a very general scenario. The world says that you, as a Christian, should approve of lawbreaking in just one area (though it’s never really just one area, is it?). If you go along with this thinking then you are nice, a friend to the downtrodden and underprivileged. You really are a Christian. On the other hand, if you don’t go along with this thinking then you are a racist and a xenophobe who hates everyone who doesn’t look like you. Whoa! Things escalated quickly. How did we get here? Well, we accepted to the world’s bargain and traded truth for emotionalism as our authority. We do not realize how deep this problem resides within us and evangelical churches. This problem crosses over into all areas of life. Rosaria Butterfield writes, “The world is in chaos, and the church is divided because we have failed to obey God and value his plan for how men and women should live. We foolishly believed that we could permanently extricate the gospel from the creation ordinance—that we could have the New Testament without the Old. We foolishly believed that personal piety and love for Jesus require no doctrinal integrity and no foundation in the Bible as God’s inerrant, sufficient, and inspired word. We foolishly believed that we could reinvent our calling as men and women, defy God’s pattern and purpose for the sexes, and somehow reap God’s blessing. God’s plan for men and women, the creation ordinance, is first found in Genesis 1. And it is central—not peripheral—to the gospel of Jesus Christ.”[2] We are reaping what we have sown.
Consider another example. There is a boy named Alex (under 10 years old) who desperately wants a toy that belongs to another child. So, Alex takes the toy from the other child. When confronted the Alex’s defense is, “I didn’t have one and I wanted it.” You are not entirely comfortable with what has happened, but others are telling you, “It is okay. The other child’s parents can afford to buy another toy. Alex doesn’t have many toys and has gone without for a long time. So, he really deserves the toy. Life has not been fair to him.” It is an unfortunate situation, but maybe not for the reasons you think. Is it right for Alex to take someone else’s property? Based upon the standard of Scripture, no. It is stealing regardless of how you feel about it. “But, Alex doesn’t have much and he had a really tough upbringing.” The rationale is that the sin is really not that bad because the one doing it is poor and had a difficult life. As a result, he should be allowed to break the law because of how tough he has had it. If things were not so bad for him then he wouldn’t need to break the law. Besides, it is only one law. Does this change whether or not the actions are in fact wrong? No, it does not. Why? Because truth is the standard, not how we feel about it. So, regardless of public sentiment truth still reigns supreme. As a friend once described to me about those with challenging past circumstances, “It helps explain, but it doesn’t excuse wrong behavior.” We can have sympathy for people without excusing or enabling wrongdoing.
The play that is run over and over against Christians is to target our sympathy and fear of man. We must recognize the strategy and be prepared to resist it. We will be called unpleasant names. They will present stories/images to us that will pull on our heartstrings. All of this is meant to manipulate us, dear Christians. Each of us has a limit. What names are we afraid to be called? These would be names designed to steer us to compromise truth. The Pharisees accused Jesus of being a glutton and a drunkard (Luke 7:34). John the Baptist was accused of having a demon because of his rugged and minimalistic way of life (Luke 7:33). Would you and I be steered (i.e. manipulated into compromising truth) because someone called us uncaring, unloving, hateful, judgmental, privileged, racist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic, misogynistic, a fundamentalist, or a legalist? Someone will respond, “But, racism does exist! Xenophobia does exist! Misogyny does exist!” Humanity is sinful and these sins do occur. But, not every accusation is credible. Just because a person feels something is true does not make it so. How do we determine the credibility of such accusations? We determine them based upon an honest evaluation of our own hearts before the Lord, based upon the teaching of the Word of God. The standards of Scripture do not change. It does not bend with the whims or sensibilities of each successive age. The Word of God is not subject to the perceptions of sinful man.
Christians have been attacked repeatedly via the aforementioned playbook. This is how D.E.I. (through claims of inequality and racism), abortion (through claims of inequality and misogyny), female clergy (through claims of inequality and misogyny), homosexual marriage (through claims of inequality and homophobia), the transgender agenda (through claims of inequality and transphobia), preferred pronouns (through claims of love and transphobia), etc… have gained a foothold in some corners of evangelicalism. It was a trojan horse operation with “niceness, love, tolerance, and equality” emblazoned on the side. Joe Rigney observes, “Our world demands that whole communities adapt to their most reactive, unstable, and immature members.”[3] But, it was not just an infiltration from the outside. Here is a troubling reality, there are a number of unbelievers who are members of local churches. These unbelievers attend services, teach classes, work in nurseries, serve on committees, etc… Sometimes, they even pastor churches. As unregenerate people they do not possess the mind of Christ (1 Cor. 2:16b). They are dead in their sins (Eph. 2:1-2). They are not new creations in Christ (2 Cor. 5:17). Rather, they are under wrath (Eph. 2:3b; John 3:18, 36). They are wolves in sheep’s clothing (Matt. 7:15). Unbelievers are of their father, the devil (John 8:44). They introduce false doctrine and undermine biblical standards. They are tares in the midst of the wheat (Matt. 13:38). When we consider this reality, it shocks the system. How could such a thing happen, unbelievers as members and leaders? The N.T. depicts this as a clear and present danger in local churches (Jude 4, 10-16; 2 Peter 2:1-3, 10-22). It happens in our day as well.
Genuine believers can be manipulated. The pressure really grows when those within the church begin to push for compromise because things are uncomfortable. They are steered and they seek to steer others. Adam followed his wife into sin rather than resisting and leading (Gen. 3). He abdicated his role of spiritual leadership and responsibility as a man. When confronted he blamed his wife. Aaron feared the displeasure of the people so he made an idol (Exod. 32). He abdicated his role of spiritual leadership and responsibility as a man. When confronted he blamed the people. Peter compromised the gospel and separated himself from the Gentile Christians because he feared the circumcision party (Gal. 2:11-21). He abdicated his role of spiritual leadership and responsibility as a man. When confronted he blamed the people. Were they uncomfortable situations? I am sure that they were. It helps explain, but it doesn’t excuse them. We must resist the errors of Adam, Aaron, and Peter. Joe Rigney writes, “The cure for our fever is sober-minded leaders who are grounded in the glory of God, and therefore possess clarity of mind, stability of soul, and readiness to act. This enables them to orient and direct their families, churches, schools, businesses, and nations for God’s purposes. Such leaders are able to weather anxiety storms, resist social stampedes, reject blame-shifting and excuse-making, and maintain their integrity in an age of anxiety, agitation, and turmoil. But the moment that you begin to cultivate mature, sober-minded leadership, you should expect sabotage, both from within and without.”[4] So, how should we respond? We begin by no longer believing the lies of counterfeit Christianity (i.e. worldliness that sprinkles in some “Jesus language” occasionally). We must return to the Christianity that is actually described in the Word of God. We must hold fast to Scripture and sound doctrine. We must practice biblical church membership (i.e. regenerate church membership with accompanying adherence to church doctrine and covenant) and biblical church discipline. Finally, we must pray, asking God to help us to be faithful to him and his Word. May God help us to be soberminded, strong and courageous, in the faith.
[1] Allie Beth Stuckey, Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion (p. xii). Penguin Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
[2] Rosaria Butterfield, Five Lies of Our Anti-Christian Age (pp. 6-7). Crossway. Kindle Edition.
[3] Joe Rigney, Leadership and Emotional Sabotage: Resisting the Anxiety That Will Wreck Your Family, Destroy Your Church, and Ruin the World (p. 9). Canon Press. Kindle Edition.
[4] Joe Rigney, Leadership and Emotional Sabotage: Resisting the Anxiety That Will Wreck Your Family, Destroy Your Church, and Ruin the World (p. 38). Canon Press. Kindle Edition.
Like this:
Like Loading...